Save Our Sodus



.. we are all partners in water quality ….. join us!

We are all partners in water quality

Why low Lake Ontario levels mean high St. Lawrence levels

May 17, 2013 by SOS-admin | Comments Off

by David Sommerstein, in Canton, NY

May 17, 2013 — We’ve reported for months – years even – that the Great Lakes, from Superior to Ontario, are at historically low water levels.

So we were surprised to get this news this week: regulators are lowering the gates at the Iroquois Dam near Ogdensburg because the St. Lawrence River is too high.

David Sommerstein pieces together the water levels puzzle.

Last weekend, shoreline homeowners and boaters between Ogdensburg and Massena were alarmed to look out the window and watch the St. Lawrence rise.

The shore was eroding away. A lot of people had their boats damaged. Docks were under water.

Dalton Foster is president of the Wilson Hill Association and an expert on water levels in this part of the St. Lawrence.

Here’s what happened. Regulators are trying to do something about those low water levels on Lake Ontario. So they’re letting less water through the hydropower dam near Massena. In other words, they’re trying to hold back water and store it on Lake Ontario.

The problem was, says Foster, west and southwest winds whipped up at the same time, basically pushing water across Lake Ontario and into the St. Lawrence.

That pushes more water down the river.

And because regulators were still letting less water go through the dam in Massena, the river had nowhere to go but up.

Like if you put more water into a bucket than you’re letting out, the water level goes up.

Hence the flooding Foster was talking about.

So Wednesday, regulators decided to try something else. They lowered the gates of the Iroquois Dam, a much smaller structure upriver from the big Massena power dam.

The gates of the Iroquois Dam are normally raised and kept above the water level to allow recreational boats to go back and forth.

That’s your water regulator – John Kangas, U.S secretary of the International St. Lawrence River Board of Control.

Picture a bunch of garage doors above the river. Wednesday, Kangas ordered those garage doors to be dipped down into the water. And that restricts the water flow and lowers the river several inches.

This doesn’t hold back the water. The same amount of water is going through the river. What it does is just change the river profile a little bit.

Dalton Foster in Wilson Hill says lowering the gates at Iroquois Dam has helped lower the River’s level…a little.

Yesterday it was down, but now it’s coming back up again, cause the wind has shifted again.

Ahh, those pesky winds from the southwest.

So we have two takeaways. Regulator John Kangas fears more dry weather this summer, so he’s trying to store 2 inches of extra water on Lake Ontario to release this fall.

Fall tends to be a kind of critical time. St. Lawrence is falling. Lake Ontario is falling. Ottawa River is normally falling. There might be a need to put a little bit more water down the St. Lawrence River to help out the downstream with their intakes and navigation.

To help with drinking water intakes and boating.

That’s why they’re doing that, and it’s very reasonable to do.

The second takeaway, says Dalton Foster, is one man-made change to this vast natural system has many consequences.

It will have many effects and it will have different effects all the way down the river.

That means if you live along the river from Ogdensburg to Massena, look out for your docks and boats.

AUV mission Sodus Point Beach May 15th (Short Notice)

May 14, 2013 by SOS-admin | Comments Off

PRESS RELEASE: IMMEDIATE USE MAY 14, 2013

Contacts:Dave White, New York Sea Grant, 315-312-3402, cell: 315-402-3926
Dr. Greg Boyer, SUNY ESF, cell: 315-559-1261
NYSG Great Lakes Publicist: Kara Lynn Dunn, 315-465-7578
SUNY ESF Communications: Claire B. Dunn, 315-470-6650

Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV) Launching in Lake Ontario; Will Collect 5-Year Great Lakes Research Data

Oswego, NY – Two autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV) are launching on Lake Ontario this week at Sodus Point, Oswego, Rochester and Oak Orchard, NY. The high-tech, remote-controlled equipment will produce intensive data for analysis of nearshore-offshore interactions, fish productivity in Lake Ontario, changes to the lower food web, and algal abundance.

The research will also focus on how the thermal bar – a seasonal/spring temperature barrier – impacts nutrients in nearshore aquatic environment.

This AUV visit to Lake Ontario is made available through the Great Lakes Observing System with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 2, New York’s Great Lakes Research Consortium (GLRC) member schools, i.e., SUNY Colleges at Brockport and Oswego and the College of Environment Science and Forestry (SUNY ESF) in Syracuse NY; and New York Sea Grant.

This 2013 research on Lake Ontario is part of the Cooperative Science Monitoring Initiative (CMSI) between the US and Canada called for under the Clean Water Act of 1972. The CSMI cycles its intensive monitoring activities through the five Great Lakes, one lake per year for every five years.

“The Great Lakes system forms a unique ecosystem, natural environment, economic engine, recreational resource, and public water supply. The evolution of technology greatly facilitates the scientific study of the dynamics of the individual lakes and the Great Lakes Basin in its entirety. This first-time underwater research on Lake Ontario provides the opportunity to synthesize intense biological, chemical, geological, and other data for use by multiple stakeholder groups from natural resource and fisheries managers to marina operators and angler associations,” said Coastal Recreation and Tourism Specialist Dave White with New York Sea Grant at SUNY Oswego.

“The autonomous underwater vehicles represent the next wave in environmental sampling of our Great Lakes. No longer do we need to put two people in a boat and send them out for a day putting instruments in and out of the water. We can program these AUVs to leave from shore, go out, travel up and down in the water column, collecting thousands of data points, and then return home,” said research leader Dr. Gregory L. Boyer, chair of the SUNY ESF Department of Chemistry and director of Great Lakes Research Consortium.

“The units we are deploying in Lake Ontario in 2013 are designed for nearshore work, but we also have access to ‘gliders’ that can go out for weeks to a month at a time. It is truly an exciting time to be a Great Lakes researcher,” Boyer added.

Boyer is a biochemist whose work focuses on the chemistry and ecology of freshwater ad marine harmful algal blooms, rapid detection methods for the toxins produces by these organisms, and the impact of blue-green algal blooms on the recreational use of the Great Lakes and other waters. New York Sea Grant has provided funding for several research projects by Boyer, including a current project on algal bloom in Sodus Bay.

For updates on New York Sea Grant activities, www.nyseagrant.org has RSS, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube links. -30-

More Info:
GLOS University of MichiganThe 42-pound, 6.5-feet long, torpedo-like Iver2-580 AUV-EP42 has side scan sonar, multiple sensor payloads, 10 Beam Doppler Velocity Log for bottom tracking, and EcoMapper technology for high-resolution water quality monitoring.

The AUV generates data to computer chip, including 3-dimensional survey maps on such factors as temperature, turbidity, depths, pH, current, video images, oxygen levels, phosphorus/etc. levels, conductivity, and more.

The AUV Operator for the Lake Ontario research work is Russ Miller with the Great Lakes Observing Systems Regional Association.

New York Sea Grant (NYSG) is a cooperative program of Cornell University and the State University of New York, and one of 33 university-based programs under the National Sea Grant College Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). This network also includes a National Sea Grant Law Center and National Sea Grant Library. Through its statewide network of integrated services, NYSG has been promoting coastal vitality, environmental sustainability, and citizen awareness about the State’s Great Lakes and marine resources since 1971.

On a side note: Great Lakes Observing System in-water buoys are beginning to be deployed for 2013. Learn more at www.nyglrc.info.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

SCHEDULE CHANGE

The plan current is :

On Wednesday, May 15th 8:00 A.M. -the send off is at Sodus Point Beach Park.

The plan is for an 8:00 am launch and a 3:-4 pm retrieval. , find the temperature differences and then come home for a 3-4 pm retrieval.

This is weather dependent so if the waves are too big the mission may need to be aborted.

Thursday: Scheduled to deploy it off Oswego Harbor Thursday May 16th morning.
The plan is for an 8:00 am launch and a 3:-4 pm retrieval. They will launch it by hand from the Beach near the University and ask that it return to the same place. It goes out – drives around for about 6-8 hours then comes back. The plan is to have it come back to the beach and then pick it up by hand.

Friday Rochester- 8.A.M. The AUV will do the same type of thing – namely go out, find the temperature differences and then come home. The plan is for an 8:00 am launch and a 3:-4 pm retrieval.

Saturday Oak Orchard 8a.m. The AUV will do the same type of thing – namely go out, find the temperature differences and then come home. The plan is for an 8:00 am launch and a 3:-4 pm retrieval.

More information on the click here.

We hope you can make it even with the short notice. We’ll take photos and post to our twitter and facebook feeds.

Lake Ontario Water Levels – USACE Revised Forecast

May 7, 2013 by SOS-admin | Comments Off

revised-forcast-lake-ontario

The Army Corps has revised its six month water level forecast for Lake Ontario. The new forecast shows Lake Ontario near average, except for very dry water supply conditions with low probabilities of occurring. According to the International St. Lawrence River Control board an outflow reduction of 200 cu.m/s (7000 cfs) less than the plan outflow for a week would see the water level rise on Lake Ontario 0.6 cm (0.2 in) if inflow from Lake Erie, evaporation, precipitation, and runoff into the lake remained the same. If water is released during the summer to help water levels downstream, it would be a similar small difference in water level. In 2012 water levels in Lake Ontario were low because water supplies were so low. The extra water the Board released was able to help out water users downstream without changing anything much for users upstream.

Six-month forecast for Montreal Harbour May-October 2013

http://ajleeonline.com/